Wednesday, July 1, 2026 Sign In
Politics

California Tries to Keep Trump off Primary Ballot

SB27 requires presidential and gubernatorial candidates to release five years' worth of tax returns.

California Tries to Keep Trump off Primary Ballot

The California Legislature is taking a second run at keeping Donald Trump off the state's primary ballot. Last week, the Senate and Assembly passed legislation to require that candidates for president, and governor, hand over five years' worth of tax returns before their name gets onto the ballot next March. President Trump has refused to release his 1040s, the first president since Gerald Ford to balk at doing so. A predecessor bill, 2017's SB 149, was vetoed by then-governor Jerry Brown, who doubted it passed the constitutional test, as well as opening a "slippery slope" of other demands, his veto message said.

The bill, written by state senators Scott Wiener of San Francisco and Mike McGuire of Eureka, passed both chambers handily with more than the two-thirds vote required. Both of Santa Barbara's legislators, State Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson and Assemblymember Monique Limón, voted for the bill. Jackson pointed to Trump's refusal, and said she preferred transparency: "I’ve always suspected, as the public does, that President Trump has things he wants to hide.” Limón thought the returns would "provide an important snapshot of a President’s financial investments, possible donations, and outside income."

SB 27 is fairly identical to SB 149 in its language, but adds candidates for governor to the list. "[T]he State of California has a strong interest in ensuring that its voters make informed, educated choices in the voting booth," the proposed law says. "[A] Presidential candidate’s income tax returns provide voters with essential information regarding the candidate’s potential conflicts of interest, business dealings, financial status, and charitable donations." SB 27 goes on to say the information shows the risk of a candidate "engaging in corruption or the appearance of corruption" and "any violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause of the United States Constitution or statutory prohibitions on behavior such as insider trading." It adds that compliance costs would be "trivial."