Monday, June 29, 2026 Sign In
Housing

Pini Forks Over $1.6 Million to Set Repairs in Motion

Santa Barbara landlord funds code violation fixes on two of eight properties after 10 months' stalemate.

Pini Forks Over $1.6 Million to Set Repairs in Motion
Dario Pini

Following a long, intense court hearing, landlord Dario Pini took a $1.6 million step toward fixing close to 2,000 code violations at his Santa Barbara properties. Since a receiver was appointed for eight of the properties in April 2018 for Building Code and Health & Safety Code violations, the intervening 10 months have been spent finding contractors and arguing on paper and in court, with one filing accusing the receiver of taking Pini's stuff. Judge Colleen Sterne put her foot down in early February, ordering the payment of the most substantial funding to date on the issue at hand: substandard housing conditions at Pini's properties.

The receiver, William Hoffman of San Diego, and his management company, Trigild, had fixed by last fall about 400 of the simpler code violations using the rents they'd collected in Pini's stead, but the large-scale work that can put walls back, correct wiring and plumbing, and repair rotted beams and joists require real capital. The $1.6 million kick-starts the permits and planning for Pini's Mission Street and Arrellaga Street properties, as well as the re-housing of tenants if necessary. The apartments that remain to be fumigated for vermin should now be able to be tented, funds that were ordered to be paid in September.

A few tenants have refused to pay the new landlord since Hoffman took possession or to allow his managers into their apartments to inspect for mold or code violations, adding to the delays. Among the 75 total units, 21 tenants have been served with quit notices, most for nonpayment of rent, and 13 units sit vacant, according to Hoffman's latest report to the court. The vacancies were the subject of one of myriad court motions Pini's attorney Paul Burns has filed, this one to compel Hoffman to rent empty apartments; too much income was lost when a tenant moved out and Hoffman did not replace them, Burns argued. Judge Sterne denied the motion in January, stating that moving in a tenant who will have to move out for repairs made little sense. She also made it clear to the receiver that any rentable units were to be rented.